[ home ] [ pony / townhall / rp / canterlot / rules ] [ arch ]

/townhall/ - Townhall

A place for civilized animals
Name
Email
Subject
Comment
File
Flags  
Embed
Password (For file deletion.)

 No.2[Reply]

File: 1559435267262.png (905.05 KB, 1280x720, 16:9, Mayor,_Let's_get_galloping….png) ImgOps Google

Welcome to /townhall/! This is an anonymous-only board for debates, dialectics, and discussions of a serious nature.

As the topics discussed on this board may deal with sensitive or controversial subject matter, we expect a higher standard of conduct than elsewhere on the site, and will enforce the board's rules with a greater degree of strictness. Inability or unwillingness to follow the rules will result in a /townhall/-only ban.

 No.3

1) All posts in a given thread must contribute constructively to the conversation, whether agreeing or disagreeing. Off-topic, contentless, inflammatory, or hostile posts will be deleted and result in a ban.

1a) Derails that occur as a natural result of discussion progressing from the original subject will generally not be interfered with; however, if these hinder discussion of the original topic, making a new thread is preferred.

1b) Part of contributing constructively is understanding and addressing the reasoning behind an opposing view. While this can be a tedious task and will generally not be officially enforced, please make an effort to at the very least avoid "talking past" someone when presented with a counterargument. Simply doubling down on your initial point does not advance a discussion.

1c) Be as willing to "lose" as you are to "win", and above all else, be willing to learn and understand. You will not get the most out of this board if your only goal is to persuade, and you will not even be effective at that unless you understand what you are arguing against.


2) Ad hominems and other uncivil behavior will not be tolerated. You may have a significant personal stake in some subjects discussed here, and it is normal to be frustrated when someone cannot relate; however, lashing out is not an effective way to engender sympathy for your position, and will not advance the conversation in a constructive way. Even if you find someone's argument morally abhorrent, there are constructive ways to express this.

2a) Attempting to deliberately provoke an uncivil reaction is prohibited, even if it is done within the letter of the law.

2b) Snark and other forms of mockery are strongly discouraged and may result in warnings or bans.

2c) "Strawmanning" an "opponent" deliberately will be regarded as uncivil conduct and will be dealt with accordingly. This will not apply to genuine misunderstandings.


3) While we do not claim to be arbiters of absolute moral or empirical truth and aim to moderate this board in a fair and even-handed, politically agnostic manner, the following extreme positions are considered "off-limits" regardless of how they are put forward, including attempts to "hint" or dogwhistle:

Post too long. Click here to view the full text.


 No.14809[Reply]

File: 1731041209876.jpg (259.59 KB, 1920x1080, 16:9, unforgotten-s5-get-ready-D….jpg) ImgOps Exif Google

If somebody kills a child molester, assuming that it's just some ordinary person living a regular life who did that out of rage for the action and nothing else, what should the proper punishment be for that murderer be, if anything?

A British TV movie that's in the franchise known as 'Unforgotten' touches upon this. The police officers catch the attacker but face a dilemma in which they can't agree among themselves if they want to even arrest the murderer since their motivations were so, so clear and seemingly relatable.

What would you do?
12 posts and 2 image replies omitted. Click reply to view.

 No.14887

Context for the fictional drama can be found here:

https://www.imdb.com/title/tt4192812/

It was created by media figure Chris Lang of London, England.

 No.15007

>>14885
Hot take: pedophiles that do not act upon their urges should not be treated as subhuman filth because they haven't actually done anything.

Thoughts?

 No.15009

>>14885
I don't really care if they're human or not.
It's not inherently wrong to kill a human.


 No.14995[Reply]

File: 1732078602365.jpg (77.81 KB, 600x856, 75:107, Rebecca.(Cyberpunk_.Edgeru….jpg) ImgOps Exif Google

Are you for team anal, or do you stand by Truth and Justice?

 No.15000

File: 1732091219513.png (88.22 KB, 797x494, 797:494, ANAL.png) ImgOps Google

ANAL? Love it!

Blowing things up is fun!

 No.15003

>>15000
>Blowing things up is fun!

Ah, you blew my back out with that one

 No.15008



 No.14873[Reply]

File: 1731818562224.png (590.25 KB, 666x444, 3:2, Capybaras (2).png) ImgOps Google

Capybaras and other animals closely associated with South America alone (and like nowhere else) should be fully domesticated and then brought to other continents. I think. At least, well, I'd love for that to happen.

Does anybody else agree?
4 posts and 1 image reply omitted. Click reply to view.

 No.15002

File: 1732092058871.gif (1.3 MB, 640x358, 320:179, zero-two-eating-zero-two.gif) ImgOps Google

>>14892
>>14874
No need to be an asshole to them

 No.15004

>>15002
Fuck you too

 No.15006

File: 1732100944748.gif (327.91 KB, 498x294, 83:49, 1731788549208.gif) ImgOps Google

>>15004
Only if you ask me nicely.


 No.15005[Reply]

.


 No.14928[Reply]

File: 1732013275850.jpg (115.25 KB, 1200x675, 16:9, dfdfd.jpg) ImgOps Exif Google

>Day 1000 of a two week military operation
5 posts and 1 image reply omitted. Click reply to view.

 No.14997

>Day 28,999 of the illegal occupation of Kárpátalja by Ukraine

 No.14998

>Day 5,032,255,000,000 +/- 73,000,000,000 of the occupation of the universe by atoms

 No.15001

File: 1732091602404.png (7.12 MB, 2662x2662, 1:1, KingCharles-In-Costume.png) ImgOps Google

>the British throne has been illegally and immorally occupied by a clique of usurping ethnic Germans in the House of Windsor since 17 July 1917


 No.14877[Reply][Last 50 Posts]

File: 1731878441819.jpg (375.74 KB, 1342x1817, 1342:1817, Screenshot_20210118-113034….jpg) ImgOps Exif Google

I've been hanging out in the ponychan/ponyville community for 12 years at this point and despite all my best efforts to share my experiences with being transgender the entire time I've been here, it really frustrates me how people here (mainly in /townhall/) will still regurgitate bullshit about transgender people like myself despite everything I have ever shared about my experiences.

I mean, from my perspective the situation is an absurdity worthy of Camus, what I experience is a part of my private subjective experience of being myself and by the nature of entirely subjective experiences, it produces no physical evidence I can share with anyone. It's a feeling of dissonance and incongruity between what seems intuitive in my mind and what I recognize and experience 24/7 with the body I have. I'm not delusional, I don't believe I was literally born female nor do I believe I have a female soul or anything like that. I know I was born male and that I have a male body complete with a deep voice, facial hair, thick body hair and male genitals ... all of which has always been unnerving to me for reasons that I have no explanation for and it makes as little sense to me as it would to you. And yet, those here who would oppose my right to the pursuit of happiness and would demand I produce the empirical evidence to justify what I am doing to mitigate the pain of that dissonance, seemingly unaware or unconcerned that such a standard is literally impossible and instead continue to repeat the most bad faith strawman narratives about me and others like us here that get passed around in all sorts of transphobic echo chambers all over the internet.

I'm not going through transition for ideological, philosophical, or religious reasons. I've been on hormones for nearly 2 years now and the benefits have been much more than 'merely cosmetic', before I went through any visible changes, I went through very welcome psychological changes, it's literally for the sake of my mental health and I don't care if that creeps you out or disgust you cause it doesn't make sense to you.

You aren't omniscient, and maybe people outthere experience things you do not or cannot experience, just because it doesn't make sense to you doesn't give weight to your paranoid solipsistic narratives about it, and your paranoid narratives about it don't justify your support for any politician or their policies to rob us of the right to become comfortable in our own skin for thePost too long. Click here to view the full text.
93 posts and 28 image replies omitted. Click reply to view.

 No.14993

The entire trans agenda:
>taking your own "private subjective experiences"
>applying it universally to people (especially children) with other "private subjective experiences"
>throwing a fit that people don't want your irreversibly life altering medical malpractice applied to other people's children

 No.14996

File: 1732082301520.jpg (367.04 KB, 1373x936, 1373:936, Screenshot_20210118-120213….jpg) ImgOps Exif Google

>>14993

You know what I've never experienced?  A manic episode, cause I'm not bipolar. If someone told me they were on the verge of a manic episode, I'm not going to be so arrogant to assert it doesn't happen just because I've never experienced it.

You people are fucking cowards and I am going to make /townhall/ worse for all of you daily

 No.14999

File: 1732090462250.jpeg (100.43 KB, 800x1200, 2:3, 00115-4067656229.jpeg) ImgOps Google

What the hell did I do?


 No.14876[Reply]

.

 No.14889

Matthew 7 is apt for understanding basically everything to do with the MAGA movement.

Especially:
>"9 “Which of you, if your son asks for bread, will give him a stone? 10 Or if he asks for a fish, will give him a snake? 11 If you, then, though you are evil, know how to give good gifts to your children, how much more will your Father in heaven give good gifts to those who ask him! 12 So in everything, do to others what you would have them do to you, for this sums up the Law and the Prophets."

And also:
>"15 “Watch out for false prophets. They come to you in sheep’s clothing, but inwardly they are ferocious wolves. 16 By their fruit you will recognize them. Do people pick grapes from thornbushes, or figs from thistles? 17 Likewise, every good tree bears good fruit, but a bad tree bears bad fruit. 18 A good tree cannot bear bad fruit, and a bad tree cannot bear good fruit. 19 Every tree that does not bear good fruit is cut down and thrown into the fire. 20 Thus, by their fruit you will recognize them."

 No.14911

>>14889

I doubt MAGA evangelicals have ever actually read the Bible, or if they did were too afraid of accidentally burning for all eternity to think about it for themselves.

 No.14919

>>14911
Those words needed to be quoted anyways, though, regardless.


 No.14847[Reply]

File: 1731219760886.jpeg (64 KB, 737x716, 737:716, BB1nzedP.jpeg) ImgOps Google

I am drowning
5 posts omitted. Click reply to view.

 No.14896

File: 1731916216867.jpg (7.11 KB, 259x194, 259:194, awkward.jpg) ImgOps Exif Google

>>14847

It's not even working class poor people. For example, I could have been an engineer, but I could see that even that wasn't worth it. Work a meaningless job for longer per day than when you went to school and with less vacation time while having no friends or ability to make them? No, thank you, sirs.

 No.14897

File: 1731920857223.png (7.2 MB, 3443x2112, 313:192, ElonMusk_doesn't_care_abou….png) ImgOps Google

>>14896
"You weren't born to wealthy parents? Eat shit."

- the United States of America, summarized in two sentences

The amazing thing is that we like this. We need this. We support this.

We're the ones that go on and on about how incredibly handsome and devastatingly smart Elon Musk is. We're the ones that vote to kill labor unions. We're the ones that abandon public institutions such as libraries, schools, and so on. We're the ones that make sure that any public figure who advocates for something like minimum wage hikes gets demonized. We're the ones who foam at the mouth at how badly we love AI generated anything. And it goes on.

We're getting what we want. Good and hard. We're getting it.

 No.14903

>>14897
>The amazing thing is that we like this. We need this. We support this.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Pyzg3biuz1Q


 No.14862[Reply]

File: 1731477313871.png (441.29 KB, 434x737, 434:737, Gardevoir_going_into_despa….png) ImgOps Google

Do you ever feel that people get too horny for certain 'Pokemon' and 'Digimon'?

Does that ever make you frustrated? At least, well, a little bit?
9 posts and 2 image replies omitted. Click reply to view.

 No.14880

File: 1731895732421.png (148.19 KB, 690x520, 69:52, 124141.PNG) ImgOps Google

>>14872
No, but there are a myriad of others. Some of whom turned out successful, some that did not. Some more aimed towards "normies" than the wild poke-fucker, though others like Loppunny, especially the mega version, are certainly as overt as they come.

Lucario is a good example of these things never being 'guaranteed', and no amount of intent can override natural appeal.
Fellah's got 30k on E621, after all, where Vaporeon, Lopunny, and Salazzle don't manage half that. Hell, poor Salazzle doesn't even hit 10k. Though, mind you, Vaporeon is more 'meme' than intention from Nintendo.

 No.14884

File: 1731902665479.jpg (197.12 KB, 1315x2000, 263:400, 225c14f0d4101a7167e1a1d9b0….jpg) ImgOps Exif Google

For certain Pokémon? Sure. For Pokémon in general? Not really. Variety is the spice of life and fifteen thousand pages of Gardevoirs taking backshots is not variety.

 No.14888

>>14884
>fifteen thousand pages of Gardevoirs taking backshots
Wait... what?


 No.14651[Reply][Last 50 Posts]

File: 1730873338601.png (301.23 KB, 1079x1114, 1079:1114, Screenshot_20241106-010711.png) ImgOps Google

It looks like Trump won.
143 posts and 35 image replies omitted. Click reply to view.

 No.14817

>>14815
Sure.
But there's still a difference between them.

 No.14819

>>14817

Understandable, yeah, thank you.

 No.14844



 No.14757[Reply]

File: 1730938529628.jpg (9.28 KB, 294x171, 98:57, China-With-Iran-And-North-….jpg) ImgOps Exif Google

Is it hypothetically possible that people in support of Donald Trump could unite to some degree with those who voted against him by this big tent of voters mutually opposing either China, Iran, North Korea, or Russia, or some combination of those governments?

Or is that not at all possible?

What will end up happening, in your view?
18 posts and 6 image replies omitted. Click reply to view.

 No.14855


 No.14856


 No.14861



 No.14857[Reply]

.

 No.14858

>>14857
Letting Perfect Be The Enemy Of Good: The Movie.

 No.14859

He addresses this in the video, but it's very weird to call Trump Barabas, because the implication is that Harris is somehow the Jesus figure.  And I don't know that she's particularly more Christlike than even Trump, who's notably quite distant.

But the real message here is summed up by "Laws will never change a person's heart."  Which is just true.  And that's a practical conundrum, not just a spiritual one.  Because oftentimes laws do not stop things from occurring.

Heck, really obvious example, gun control.  The biggest opposition argument against gun control is "People won't listen to it and now the victims won't have guns."  And that's true, I do believe that.  But having been given that axiom, to say "We will make abortions illegal and now there won't be any more abortions." seems ludicrous.  Of course there are going to be more abortions, you didn't convince anyone to not have them, you made it slightly more difficult.  Now they'll have to pay more, travel more, or potentially even escalate to being put to death, none of which solves the abortion problem.

 No.14860

>>14859
They're not really equivalent. A gun is a tool, and criminals exist regardless of them. Ultimately the ones you want to prevent from using guns are those who are already committing crime, not the law-abiding. (Well, at least ideally, but let's not get in to 'true motivations' today...) And on top of that, the fact of the matter is, a criminal can still kill you in a myriad of other ways with a range of other tools.

Abortions are more comparable to drugs, if anything. Though lacking the addictive quality is liable to remove the 'drive' to continue using them, of course.
Banning drugs does lower their use; We can see that to an extent with the areas that have allowed for weed, for instance. It's just that banning something doesn't mean it goes entirely away.


 No.14824[Reply]

File: 1731075248371.png (25.31 KB, 222x180, 37:30, hmm-pepe.png) ImgOps Google

How do we think all those on far left who are right now screaming and crying into cameras about how Trump is going to deport all Mexicans and lock all non straight white men, all LGBT and trans people in concentration camps and remove all womens rights going to feel when none of that happens?
3 posts omitted. Click reply to view.

 No.14829

>>14828
>>14827
It would be nicer to find the politician has been talking shit for all of his campaign for once.

But a lot of shit has been flung.

 No.14830

i'm locking this thread, as i don't think this meets the standards of townhall, low as they are. i do invite the OP to rephrase this thread though, and repost it for discussion.

 No.14831

>>14830
oops! that's me, by the way, sorry!


 No.14615[Reply]

File: 1730435075187.jpg (164.03 KB, 1080x767, 1080:767, Screenshot_20241031_231610….jpg) ImgOps Exif Google

Should people who aren't Chinese accept the fact that as a civilization and as an ethnicity / race their time to dominate the planet as a whole (or at least something like half of it) has come?

Has the model of multiracial, multiethnic, multireligious, etc democracy based on classical liberalism and the equality of opportunity failed, with countries such as the U.K. and the U.S. faltering? And is it time for traditionalist thinking based on authoritarian and community-centric ethical values of social order, family, purity, cultural cohesion, heritage, etc to rise, given the increasing strength of China, Iran, North Korea, and other such countries? Are the latter nations stronger due to their lack of feminism, homosexuality, ethnic mixing, minority religious rights, and other social values that the former nations fiercely defend?

To be specific, how great is Chinese naval power? What do you think it is going to be used for? And are you confident in your prediction? What is it based on?
15 posts and 6 image replies omitted. Click reply to view.

 No.14728

>>14720
Their government is trash and one of the biggest groups of people to suffer from that are the chinese people themselves. That's what happens when you get into the whole fucked up communism thing. It typically ends with people rising to power and forming dictatorships and military states.

 No.14756

>>14728
It's been eight fucking decades since Hitler, the Nazis, and the Holocaust.

A horrendously evil dictatorship exterminating the lives of countless innocent people, including children, due to psychotic militarism by those in charge? Why can't everybody of all political stripes view this as an immoral thing? Why can't everybody with a conscience want it stopped?

Why is humanity made up of such walking, talking shitbags, with no empathy?

I especially don't get why people on the right-wing side of the ideological spectrum don't like the idea of going up against the CCP: shouldn't you dudes really fucking hate communists? Like what would make them attractive to you in the slightest? Isn't it as easy as hating, say, alien rapist monsters from horror movies or something?

Why does literally anybody on Earth sincerely like the CCP... it's like rooting for AIDS... or for mosquitoes...

 No.14761

>>14756
It wasn't that bad


[]
Previous [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10]
[ home ] [ pony / townhall / rp / canterlot / rules ] [ arch ]